Profit study yields trends for organic

Photo: Thinkstock

By Ed White
Glacier FarmMedia staff

If organic farmers get 100 per cent premiums and keep their yield drag to one-third of conventional, they tend to be more profitable than conventional growers.

That’s the conclusion of a Purdue University study analyzing the profitability of typical rotations in the United States Midwest over a 10-year period.

“The net return to land for the organic rotation was $268 per acre, or approximately $110 and $120 higher than that of the conventional corn/soybean and conventional corn/soybean/wheat rotations (in the scenario studied),” concludes the June report by Michael Langemeier and Xiaoyi Fang.

The study compares the two styles of farming, with organic using more manure, labour and machinery, and conventional using more fertilizer, herbicides and insecticides.

The prices were taken from the FINBIN database at the University of Minnesota’s Centre for Farm Financial Management.

“An analysis of this sort requires a lot of assumptions,” says the report, entitled Comparison of Conventional and Organic Crop Rotations.

However, none of the assumptions appears to be a radical departure from common observations about the crop production results for competent, experienced organic growers and for organic markets.

The researchers assume organic corn yields 32 per cent less than conventional, 33 per cent less for soybeans and 24 per cent less for wheat.

With conventional corn priced at $3.60 per bushel and organic at $8.30, conventional soybeans at $8.85 and organic at $18.60 and wheat at $4.85 versus $9.70, the scenario produced net profits for the organic production of about $50 per acre but net losses of about $60-$70 per acre for the conventional systems.

Information pertaining to the relative profitability of conventional and organic production is often lacking. – report

To bring the organic system down to the level of profitability of the conventional system, yields would have to decline about another 18-20 per cent from the usual organic yield drag.

The study was undertaken because of the growing market demand for organic crops and a lack of information about relative profitability for farmers.

“Information pertaining to the relative profitability of conventional and organic production is often lacking,” note the authors.

While the results might suggest that converting to organic production makes sense for grain farmers seeking enhanced profitability, the authors also issue a caution.

The costs, yields and prices received can vary significantly, which can badly skew the profitability, they note. This might be why there is a big spread between organic producers on profitability.

The FINBIN data “shows a much wider difference in enterprise net returns among organic crop farms than their conventional counterparts.”